Drawing for ONE Y ONE

USPTO serial 79147494

ONE Y ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4766343Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 7, 2015
Examiner
GALAN, MATTHEW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE Y ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1314 TEXAS ST FL 21HOUSTON, TX 77002-6577UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers, tablet computers; mobile smart phonesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
021Drinking glasses, dishes, drinking cups, small drinking cupsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030Coffee, caffeinated coffee, barley coffeeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 6, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 5, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Oct 5, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 21, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 21, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 20, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 5, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 7, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 7, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 1, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 1, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 1, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 13, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 12, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 12, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 12, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 3, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Mar 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 2, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Feb 2, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 24, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 7, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 7, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 7, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 6, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 10, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 6, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 5, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance