Drawing for DRAGON DOME

USPTO serial 79148095

DRAGON DOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4797194Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 25, 2015
Examiner
NGUYEN, NICOLE ASHLEY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRAGON DOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jamie E. Platkin

JAMIE E. PLATKIN CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH ST FL 22HARTFORD, CT 06103-1253UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Lasers, not for medical purposes; light control systems primarily composed of electronic controls for lasers, not for medical purposes, LEDs, infared light emitters and laser diodes; light emitting diodes (LEDs); organic LED laser diodes, especially power laser diodes; optical sensors; LED lighting controls, namely, LED modules and organic LED modules for use in video surveillance systems; LED displays and organic LED displays; and component parts for all the aforesaid goods, included in this classSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 2, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 11, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 11, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 25, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 25, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 9, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 26, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 26, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 26, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 20, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance