Drawing for HARRISONS

USPTO serial 79148775

HARRISONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARRISONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flours and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (except salad dressings); spices; ice for refreshmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 24, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 23, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 26, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 11, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 11, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 31, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 9, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 9, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 3, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 19, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 16, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 16, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 16, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 15, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 15, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 7, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 3, 2014SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance