USPTO serial 79148775
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flours and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (except salad dressings); spices; ice for refreshment | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |