Drawing for DR. SCHMITT

USPTO serial 79148859

DR. SCHMITT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4741333Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 26, 2015
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR. SCHMITT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A Lowe

David A Lowe Lowe Graham Jones PLLC1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1130Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beers; [ Sparkling wine; High-quality sparkling wine; Fruit sparkling wine; Fruit sparkling wine containing berries or extracts or flavor of berries; ] Wine [ ; Semi-sparkling wine; Wine-containing beverages, namely, wine coolers; Spirit- or wine-based cocktails and aperitifs ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 26, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 1, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 1, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2020NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Nov 24, 2020C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 24, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 10, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 26, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 23, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 27, 2015CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Aug 26, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2015CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
May 26, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 18, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 18, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 6, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 5, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 25, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 25, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 24, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 11, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance