USPTO serial 79149004
KNELSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4887144Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 19, 2016
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with KNELSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Industrial water storage tanks of metal, building materials, namely, chutes of metal, bins of metal, building materials, namely, prefabricated platforms of metal, pressure vessels of common metals and their alloys for storage and transportation; and structural replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Gold and precious metal recovery machines, namely, centrifugal batch-type and continuous concentrators, grinding mills, vibrating screens being parts of machines, conveyors, chutes being parts of machines, hoppers being parts of machines, bins being parts of machines, housings being parts of machines, platforms being parts of machines, clarifiers being machines or parts of machines for use in mining, mineral processing and cement production, thickeners being machines or parts of machines for use in [ mining, ] mineral processing and cement production, concentrators for [ gravity conveyors, ] mechanical, pneumatic and hydraulic industrial process control instruments being parts of machines; and structural replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Testing and analysis equipment for use in metallurgical laboratories, namely, gravity separation testing machines for measuring and estimating recovery of minerals and metals from ore samples; instrumentation and automated process control systems comprising micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of industrial machinery; and structural replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Industrial fluidized bed reactors (FBR); and structural replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLSmidth A/S
- Other trademarks owned by FLSmidth A/S
- Other trademarks owned by FLSmidth A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named KNELSON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |