Drawing for STARPRESS

USPTO serial 79149372

STARPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4805885Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 2015
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STARPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Lydon

James C. Lydon James C. Lydon, Attorney at LawP.O. Box 1406North Springfield, VA 22151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ironing machines, namely, electric clothing pressing machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Apparatus for steam generating, namely, ironing tables that generate steam for ironing, garment steamersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
020Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; works of art made of wood, wax, plaster, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum, substitutes for all these materials or of plasticSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 31, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 14, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 25, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 25, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 26, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 29, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 29, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 8, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 23, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 3, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 3, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 3, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 19, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 19, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 24, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Apr 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 24, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 24, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 31, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 31, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 31, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 21, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance