USPTO serial 79149462
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
SARA M DORCHAK COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Engine parts for land vehicles, namely, heat exchangers, cooling systems comprised of fans, hoses and radiator fluid, and cooling equipment in the nature of radiators and fans for internal combustion engines and fuel cells and their structural parts and components as modules; machine parts for land vehicles, namely, fan clutches, fan wheels, and exhaust gas recirculation modules for motor vehicles; exhaust gas heat exchanger being parts of a machine for land vehicles; exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) cooler being parts of a machine for land vehicles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Vehicles for locomotion by land, in the air and on the water, namely, automobiles, motorcycles, boats, and locomotives, and structural parts and accessories therefor; axle boots for vehicles; steering knuckles; starter ring gears, drive shafts for land vehicles; camber plates for land vehicles; torque limited, torque converters for land vehicles, vehicle brakes; rims for vehicle wheels; flex plates, joints and drive shafts for land vehicles; encoder wheels and housings for parts of land vehicles other than for engines, hinge washers for land vehicle axles; transmissions for land vehicles; fuel lines and fuel rails for land vehicles; shaft couplings for land vehicles; disks and disk carriers as motor vehicle parts, ventilation systems for vehicles in the nature of windows, hood vents, and exhaust fans, oil pans for land vehicles, hydraulic and mechanical belt drive systems for vehicles comprised of pulleys, idler wheels, tension rollers, axles, wheel covers, wheel bearing units, and vibration and torsional vibration dampers; flywheels for land vehicles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |