Drawing for MOTOBASE

USPTO serial 79150317

MOTOBASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4683308Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 10, 2015
Examiner
ALESKOW, DAVID HOWARD
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MOTOBASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Robot machines, namely, industrial robots; industrial robot control apparatus, namely, manipulators for industrial robot bodies, manipulators for electric and gas welding machines, manipulators for power operated coating sprayer machines, and manipulators for carrier devices and cargo handling machines; [ cranes; hoists; ] conveyors machines [ ; starters for motors and engines; alternating current motors other than for land vehicles; direct current motors other than for land vehicles; electronic motor control apparatus, namely, electric servo motor control; AC generators in the nature of alternators; DC generators ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 11, 2026INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Aug 11, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 7, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 7, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 7, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 6, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 10, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 25, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 22, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Feb 22, 2021C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Feb 2, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 12, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 11, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 11, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 10, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 10, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 25, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 25, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 22, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 16, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 16, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 16, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 2, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 1, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 20, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 20, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 20, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 7, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance