Drawing for EXLABESA

USPTO serial 79150538

EXLABESA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4820144Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 29, 2015
Examiner
BERNS, LEE ANNE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXLABESA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Lee D'Amore

Elizabeth Lee D'Amore LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 Broad Street, Floor 21New York, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Building materials of metal, namely, aluminium profilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
039Transport, namely, land transportSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
040Metal treating, namely, extrusion of aluminiumSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 29, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 28, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 29, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 18, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 12, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 29, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 14, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 24, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 19, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 4, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance