Drawing for BIO NANO CONSULTING

USPTO serial 79150790

BIO NANO CONSULTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4910660Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2016
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BIO NANO CONSULTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business project management, namely, management and development of processes for the analysis and the implementation of business strategy plans and management projects; business management consultancy services; management of business projects for others; business management consultancy and advisory services; provision of business information; business planning; consultancy relating to business planning; predicting future economic growth by observing and analyzing economic trends in relation to scientific and technological sectors, namely, economic forecasting and analysis for business purposes; observing and analyzing scientific and technological environments and their present and future economic impact in order to identify threats and opportunities, namely, business analysis and business strategic planning services in the technology industry, economic forecasting and analysis for business purposes; economic forecasting and analysis of emerging trends by the analysis of products and their markets; analysis of products to examine existing markets, adjacent industries, technologies, products, players and emerging trends in relevant technologies to be able to understand where a current or future product or service fits and plan for future development, technology sourcing, potential partners, collaborators and acquisition opportunities, namely, business analysis and business strategic planning services in the technology industry, economic forecasting and analysis for business purposes. technology landscaping being the analysis of products, markets, adjacent industries, technologies, players and emerging trends to allow understanding where a current or future product or service fits, the planning of product development roadmaps, and the identification of potential partners, collaborators and acquisition opportunities, namely, business data analysis, market research, business research, business analysis and business strategic planning services in the technology industry, economic forecasting and analysis for business purposes; preparation of business plans for others; preparation of business reports for others; negotiation of contracts for others, namely, procuring of contracts for others for the purchase and sale of goods and services; compilation of statistical information for business or commercial purposes; market research and market research analysis; compilation of statistical data for use in scientific research, namely, information and data compiling and analyzing relating to business management of scientific research projects; information, consultancy and advisory services relating to all the aforesaid, namely, business advisory services, consultancy and informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 5, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 8, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 11, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 11, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 2, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 8, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 12, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 5, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance