Drawing for LE HAUT-MEDOC DE LAGRANGE

USPTO serial 79150913

LE HAUT-MEDOC DE LAGRANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4805906Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 2015
Examiner
HISER, CHARLES
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE HAUT-MEDOC DE LAGRANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis S. Prahl

Dennis S. Prahl Ladas & Parry, LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines from the Haut-Médoc region made in accordance with certain standardsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 8, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Mar 1, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Mar 1, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 5, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 26, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 14, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Dec 8, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 23, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 19, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 16, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 22, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 23, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 23, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 26, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 21, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance