USPTO serial 79151136
VITA SWEET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKS, KIMBERLY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITA SWEET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Starch for industrial purposes; cellulose; glucosides; tapioca flour for industrial purposes; cellulose esters for industrial purposes; cellulose derivatives chemicals; glucose for industrial purposes; filtering preparations for the beverages industry; chemical preparations for preserving foodstuffs; artificial sweeteners chemical preparations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |