Drawing for GENERATION EFFICIENCY

USPTO serial 79151280

GENERATION EFFICIENCY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5084072Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 22, 2016
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENERATION EFFICIENCY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl Oppedahl

Carl Oppedahl Schiefer & SchmidHasenbergsteige 5RA Dr. Andreas SautterStuttgart, 70178

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035advertising services; business management; business administration services; providing office functions; advertising and marketing; brand concept and brand development services for corporate and individual clients; advertising and publicity servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
036Financial consultancy in the energy sector; financial consultancy for energy projectsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Sep 8, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 17, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 19, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 19, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 9, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 9, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 22, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 8, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 23, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Feb 23, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Feb 22, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 22, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 6, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 17, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 17, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 17, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 1, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 27, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 27, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 27, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 27, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 20, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 3, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 30, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 30, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 4, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
May 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 19, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 19, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 4, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 28, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance