Drawing for ETAPRESHRED

USPTO serial 79151408

ETAPRESHRED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5028986Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 30, 2016
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETAPRESHRED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph D. Kuborn

JOSEPH D KUBORN ANDRUS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW LLP100 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUE SUITE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for grinding, crushing, shredding, shearing, pressing, cutting and milling, all being industrial machines for fragmenting materials of all types, and parts and fittings for such machines, namely, knives, cutting-tables and shafts, not included in other classesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 2, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 15, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 15, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 10, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 10, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 11, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 18, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 23, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 23, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 23, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 30, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 30, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 14, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 25, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 25, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 25, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 6, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 6, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 6, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 6, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 20, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 3, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 17, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 6, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 9, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 23, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 23, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 3, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 2, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 28, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance