USPTO serial 79151408
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Kuborn
JOSEPH D KUBORN ANDRUS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW LLP100 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUE SUITE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4178UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for grinding, crushing, shredding, shearing, pressing, cutting and milling, all being industrial machines for fragmenting materials of all types, and parts and fittings for such machines, namely, knives, cutting-tables and shafts, not included in other classes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 10, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 9, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |