Drawing for KISTLER LABAMP

USPTO serial 79151831

KISTLER LABAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4792461Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 18, 2015
Examiner
GALAN, MATTHEW
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with KISTLER LABAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel M. Gurfinkel

Daniel M. Gurfinkel Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suiet 2100Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic data recorders; analog-to-digital converters; digital-to-analog converters; charge amplifiers; voltage amplifiers; measuring signal amplifiers; electric power supplies; couplers for the supply and decoupling of IEPE (Integrated Electronics Piezo-Electric) sensors; electronic measuring apparatus for recording, transmitting, processing and reproducing of industrial measuring data and sensor signals; electronic measuring and signaling instruments, namely, digital signal processors, electronic signal attenuators; computers; computer software for recording, transmitting, processing, amplifying, storing and reproducing of industrial measuring data and sensor signals and for processing of digital signals and attenuating of electronic signalsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 18, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 18, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 28, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 17, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 8, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Feb 8, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Feb 2, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 14, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 2, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 2, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 18, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 18, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 2, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 2, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 13, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 13, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 24, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 22, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 23, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 23, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 23, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 23, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 11, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance