USPTO serial 79151903
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; rice, tapioca and sago; flour and preparations made from cereals; bread, pastry and confectionery; edible ices; sugar, honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt; mustard, vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; ice | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages; fruit beverages and fruit juices, syrups and other preparations for making beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages (except beers) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2014 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |