Drawing for SYMPHONY

USPTO serial 79152135

SYMPHONY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4910687Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2016
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SYMPHONY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeannine Rittenhouse

Jeannine Rittenhouse IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights RoadSuite 125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Research and development services for others in the field of automation of industrial processes; consulting services for others in the field of automation of industrial processesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 13, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 23, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 4, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 2, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 8, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 8, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 24, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 8, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 8, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 29, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 27, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance