USPTO serial 79152269
EXERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4829378Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2015
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with EXERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE-417 01 Gothenburg, SE
SE-417 01 Gothenburg, SE
Gothenburg, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Nagle, Jr.
David W. Nagle, Jr. Stites & Harbison, PLLC400 West Market St.Suite 1800Louisville, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Industrial dryers for use in heat production, drying, drying distillers grains, and steam generation; industrial dryers for drying in power production, bio-fuel production, water treatment, and sludge treatment; industrial evaporators, namely, falling film and forced circulation evaporators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |