Drawing for SWIFT COAG

USPTO serial 79152905

SWIFT COAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4957748Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 17, 2016
Examiner
FIORELLI, JOANNA ELISA-HOLGUI
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SWIFT COAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul Cosmovici

244 Fifth Avenue, 2nd Floor # suite-1279New York, NY 10001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in electrosurgical generator systems that regulate power dosing to facilitate cutting, coagulation, vaporizing and/or devitalizing tissue; high-frequency apparatus and measuring instruments, namely, electrosurgical generator systems comprised of computer software that regulates power dosing to facilitate cutting, coagulation, vaporizing and/or devitalizing tissue; software-programmable microprocessorsACTIVE
010A bipolar electrosurgical component of electrosurgical generator systems comprising surgical and medical instruments and apparatus and components thereof, that regulate power dosing to facilitate cutting, coagulating, vaporizing and/or devitalizing tissue; electrosurgical generator systems for medical purposes comprising high frequency apparatus and instruments thereof, that cut, coagulate, vaporize and/or devitalize tissueACTIVE
042[Development, programming and implementation of software that regulates power dosing to facilitate cutting, coagulation, vaporizing and devitalizing tissue in electrosurgical generator systems; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems in electrosurgical generator systems]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 8, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Oct 8, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 8, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 5, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 17, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 31, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 27, 2023INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 26, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
May 25, 2023INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 25, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 25, 202271.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Sep 9, 2022EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
May 22, 2022PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Apr 27, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 7, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 17, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 19, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 19, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 17, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 17, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 9, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 10, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 10, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 10, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 26, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 21, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 20, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Jan 20, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 20, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 20, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 20, 2016PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Dec 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 21, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 27, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 27, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 25, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 10, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 9, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance