Drawing for VIRTUAL BAKER

USPTO serial 79153322

VIRTUAL BAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5537603Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2018
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL BAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric apparatuses and machines for food processing and treatment, namely, electric food blenders and electric food processors; machine production installations and parts thereof for processing of food in the nature of bakery machines, namely, flour sifters; kneaders for edible pastes in the nature of kneading machines; dividing machines for edible pastes in the nature of food cutting machines for commercial use; food chopping machines for commercial use; linear and circular moulders for edible pastes in the nature of compression moulding machines and extrusion moulding machines; automatic dividing, moulding and processing machines for edible pastes of bread rolls in the nature of food cutting machines for commercial use; food chopping machines for commercial use; conveyor belts and conveyors for transport of edible pastes; as well as parts of the aforementioned goods, namely, belts for conveyors and blades for electric food processors; automatic conditioning installations for bread consisting of bakery provers; packaging machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Bread-making machines; bread baking machines; electric bread toasters; hot air apparatuses, namely, hot air blowers, hot air space heating apparatuses; electric heating apparatuses, namely, electric heating fans, electric heating cables; ovens for industrial purposes; roasters, namely, electric roasters, roasters powered by propane gas; coffee roasters; cooking apparatuses and installations, namely, cooking ranges, cooking ovens; electric cooking utensils, namely, electric skillets, electric slow cookers; kitchen ranges, namely, electric cooking ranges, gas ranges; cooking rings; cookers, namely, electric bread cookers; malt roasters; microwave ovens; microwave ovens for industrial purposes; cooking ovens and microwave ovens; baking ovens for industrial purposes, namely, baking cabinets in the nature of baking ovens; proofing ovens for industrial purposes, namely, proofing cabinets in the nature of proofing ovens; and parts for the aforementioned apparatuses and devices, namely, electric fryers and induction ovensSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 6, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 6, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 28, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 28, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 13, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 29, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 14, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 19, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 21, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 3, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 3, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 14, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 24, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 14, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 29, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 9, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 9, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 23, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 30, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 30, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 30, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 30, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 27, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 20, 2016GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Aug 20, 2016GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Aug 20, 2016CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Jul 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 16, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 16, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 19, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 7, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 4, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 4, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 4, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 17, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 5, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 5, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 15, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 14, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 29, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 29, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 16, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance