USPTO serial 79155034
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Clothes washing machines; electric pasta makers for domestic use; electric washing machines for household purposes; dishwashers; electric mixers, being kitchen machines; electric fruit squeezers for household purposes; electric food processors; electric food slicers; machines for packaging food; electric vegetable slicing machines; electric food milling machines; electric meat grinders; centrifugal machines; electric vegetable peelers; pasta rolling machines; pasta cutting machines; electrically-powered kitchen appliance for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |