USPTO serial 79155776
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BUSSY SAINT-GEORGES, FR
BUSSY SAINT-GEORGES, FR
BUSSY SAINT-GEORGES, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Blue Filament Law PLLC700 E. Maple RoadSuite 450Birmingham, MI 48009| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded software programs for tracking, securing, certifying, protecting, inalterable marking, and illegal copy detection of goods and documents; recorded software programs for tracking, securing, certifying, protecting, inalterable marking, and illegal copy detection of goods and documents, used to prevent or detect counterfeiting; integrated circuit cards being smart cards comprising a security element for further manufacture; magnetically encoded security cards featuring holographic security labels and optical security images for further manufacture; optical films and marking films for protective purposes comprising a security image to be embedded into product packaging and documents of others; products comprised of visible optical data media, namely, tokens and plates with coding systems or diffraction structures or holographic structures for producing an optical effect used as means of identification or validation to be embedded into goods and documents of others; all of the foregoing goods used for tracking, securing, certifying, protecting, and inalterable marking of goods and documents and for anti-counterfeiting purposes for others, and all of the foregoing excluding and not for use with optical authentication devices consisting of a mass-produced optically encoded mask and a matched optically encoded reference mask located in an optoelectronic reader | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Partially pre-printed business, commercial, and governmental documents printed on paper or hybrid paper containing plastic for further manufacture or finishing; polymer material in the nature of paper or hybrid paper containing a polymer layer, for printing and documents; printing type; labels of paper for further manufacture; adhesive holographic labels for further manufacture; identification labels of paper or hybrid paper containing a polymer layer, not magnetically encoded; cards of paper or plastic, namely, volunteer identification cards without magnetic coding, identification documents and cards in the nature of blank driver's licenses, passports and visas for issuance by government agencies, credit cards without magnetic coding, health identification cards without magnetic encoding, fiduciary identification cards and travel document cards of paper or plastic not magnetically encoded, all of the foregoing documents and cards for further manufacture or finishing; printed certificates, namely, diplomas, birth certificates, death certificates, marriage certificates of paper or plastic for further manufacture or finishing; printed financial reports, administrative documents for use by government officials, medical records, product or status certificates, fiduciary documents in the nature of bank notes, warrant certificates, check books, and stock certificates and travel documents in the nature of passports, visas, and identification cards, all of paper or plastic for further manufacture or finishing; all of the foregoing excluding and not for use with optical authentication devices consisting of a mass-produced optically encoded mask and a matched optically encoded reference mask located in an optoelectronic reader | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Printing; treatment of paper or plastic for traceability and security; providing material treatment information regarding affixing and embedding devices and materials for security of goods and documents for protection against counterfeiting, alteration or misappropriation, and to ensure the traceability and integrity of goods and documents; treatment of materials, namely, affixing and embedding product security devices in the nature of optical data media with coding systems, and/or diffraction structures and/or holographic structures and materials in a wide variety of products and documents to protect against counterfeiting, tampering, and diversion, and to ensure traceability and the integrity of genuine products and documents; document laminating services; transfer of information by pressure, namely, affixing traceability labels to products and documents by direct transfer, air-jet application, and hot stamping; all of the foregoing excluding and not for use with optical authentication devices consisting of a mass-produced optically encoded mask and a matched optically encoded reference mask located in an optoelectronic reader | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 2, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 30, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |