USPTO serial 79156515
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arkadia DeLay Olson
Arkadia DeLay Olson Husch Blackwell LLP190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video processing units; computer hardware; computer software; integrated circuits; instruction set architectures and processor architecture; integrated circuit chips; computer chip sets; microprocessors; data processors; central processing units; video graphics accelerator; video graphics controller; computer video software; cloud computing software for use in advanced video processing; semiconductors, computer chipsets and micro-processors; graphics processing units (GPUs); electronic game software; downloadable computer graphics tools; 3D, 2D, video acceleration devices for use on television, digital set top boxes, mobile applications (including radios and phones), handheld computer games, personal computers, computer tablets and micro computer chips; parts and fitting of the aforesaid goods; downloadable electronic publications | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Web site design services; design and development of computer hardware and software; design and development of computer hardware and software for graphics and video applications; design of hardware for audio and video operators; design of software for audio and video operators; cloud computing services; software as a service featuring software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software, including computer software for graphics and electronic game software; computer programming of video games; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Licensing of intellectual property rights; licensing of technology, source code, computer software; licensing of computer software and hardware; licensing of intellectual property and industrial property | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |