USPTO serial 79161311
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra Epp Ryan
Sandra Epp Ryan Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C.45 S. 7th St., Ste. 2700Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Video game consoles; controllers for video game consoles, including, wireless controllers; handheld game consoles; video game joysticks and steering wheels for use with video game consoles; video game remote controls for use with video game consoles, including, touchscreen gaming controls; accessories for gaming equipment for use with video game consoles, namely, game controllers for use in playing computer games, audio and visual headsets for use in playing video games, bags specially adapted for video game consoles, video game interactive control floor pads or mats, virtual reality headsets and helmets adapted for use in playing video games, bags and holders specially adapted for video game joysticks; video game consoles adapted for use with mobile phones and with monitors and with computers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing of training in the field of computer games and gaming; entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting of competitions in the field of computer games; organization and arrangement of competitions in the field of computer games | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2024 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2024 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |