Drawing for VEUVE DU VERNAY

USPTO serial 79167140

VEUVE DU VERNAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5005490Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 26, 2016
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with VEUVE DU VERNAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellen S. Simpson

Ellen S. Simpson Colson Law Group5555 Main StreetBuffalo, NY 14221United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Sparkling winesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Nov 19, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Nov 17, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 27, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 1, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 17, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Feb 17, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Feb 16, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 26, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2016FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 16, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 16, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 26, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 2, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 10, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 6, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 24, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 12, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Mar 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 11, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 3, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 24, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 7, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 7, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 3, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 2, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 19, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 18, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance