Drawing for DUDE

USPTO serial 79169927

DUDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHINER, MARK W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria Eliseeva

Maria Eliseeva Patentbar International PC1087 Beacon St, Suite 303Newton, MA 02459UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shorts, pants, track pants, shirts, polo shirts, t-shirts, business shirts, skirts, dresses, hats, caps, socks, jackets, jumpers, hoodiesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
028Flying discsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 15, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 14, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 28, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 28, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 28, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 1, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 1, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Dec 22, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 20, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 4, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 26, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 26, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 26, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 16, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 16, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 14, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 11, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 7, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 30, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance