CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ROWA

USPTO serial 79173710

ROWA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5288102Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 19, 2017
Examiner
VAGHANI,MAYUR C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROWA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game, not live; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; milk and milk products excluding ice milk, ice cream, frozen yogurt; edible oils and fatsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; rice; tapioca and sago; flour; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, fondants, gum paste, chocolate confections; ice-cream; yeast, baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; iceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 6, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 5, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 23, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 19, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Apr 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2016LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Apr 1, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 16, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance