Drawing for IONIQ

USPTO serial 79175076

IONIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5173469Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2017
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with IONIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Boyuan W. Wang

Boyuan W. Wang Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B St. Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobiles in the nature of electric cars, hybrid cars and plug-in hybrid cars excluding SUVs and trucksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 31, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 23, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 7, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 4, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 29, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 22, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 22, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 24, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 10, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 10, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance