Drawing for BARONA

USPTO serial 79176384

BARONA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BARONA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat stews, dried vegetables, vegetable oil, meat extracts for food, extracts from animal bone for food, animal fat extracts for making of for food, seafood extracts for food, dried fruitsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
030Spices, seasoning powder, chili sauce, tomato sauce, soya sauce, instant noodles, instant products from rice such as: rice vermicelli, pho (rice noodles), vermicelli made of cassava or bean, rice spaghetti, dry pancakes, porridge, noodles, instant sweetened porridge (made of glutinous rice, beans, fruits), fish sauceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 21, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 5, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 5, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2016CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Sep 22, 2016CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 5, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 31, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 7, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 7, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 4, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 25, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 21, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 19, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance