USPTO serial 79181325
GIMOKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIMOKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard E. Peirce
Richard E. Peirce Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC50 S. 16th Street, 22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102-2516UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea and cocoa and substitutes; artificial coffee-flavoured coffee; green coffee; lyophilized coffee; ground coffee; decaffeinated coffee; soluble coffee; fresh coffee; cappuccino; caffè latte; coffee blends; coffee substitutes; concentrated coffee; brewed coffee; coffee infusions; chocolate coffee; coffee extracts; malt coffee; coffee beans; coffee essences; coffee flavourings; coffee in brewed form and coffee-based beverages; ground coffee; coffee-based beverages; coffee-based filling; preparations for beverages coffee-based; coffee paper bags filters; roasted barley and malt to be used as coffee substitutes; coffee capsules; coffee pods; tea capsules containing tea for brewing and infusion capsules containing herbal infusions for brewing; tea pods and herbal infusion pods; chocolate-based beverages; chocolate flavoured beverages; tea-based beverages; ; non-medicinal tea-based beverages; mixes in the nature of powders containing cocoa for making chocolate-based beverages; ; prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; ginseng tea; unprocessed tea leaves; tea bags; tea essences; aromatic teas not for medicinal use; instant tea not for medicinal use; iced tea not for medicinal use; non-medicinal herbal infusions; herbal teas and infusions | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |