Drawing for CRAB

USPTO serial 79185933

CRAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Josh A. Partington

Josh A. Partington Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC11730 Plaza America Dr. #600Reston, VA 20190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for data processing, collection and analysis for the health care industry; Storage media containing software for data processing, collection and analysis for the health care industry; computer hardware; data processing apparatus for the health care industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
035Electronic data processing services relating to health care information; collection and analysis of quality metric data for health care providers for business purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Software as a service featuring software for electronic data processing, collection and analysis for the health care industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
044Consultancy services relating to health care; medical care and analysis services relating to patient treatment; preparation of reports relating to health care mattersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 3, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 9, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 7, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 6, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 20, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 20, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 7, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 6, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 16, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 16, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 13, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance