Drawing for VIET

USPTO serial 79188641

VIET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5337428Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2017
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with VIET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. LaBarge

Richard M. LaBarge Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 S. Wacker DriveSuite 6300Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Material production and processing machines, namely, polishing machines for use in shaping, cutting, engraving, horning, boring, lapping, grinding and polishing wood, plastics, stones, glass and metal; machines and machine tools for working wood and its derivatives, namely, sanding machines, brushing machines, structuring machines in the nature of brushing and sanding machines and automatic edge sanding machines; polishing machines; machines and machine tools for metalworking; machines and machine tools for processing marble and stone; machines and machine tools for processing plastic; machines and machine tools for processing leatherACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 27, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 2, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 27, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 21, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 8, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 13, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance