Drawing for GLUCARE

USPTO serial 79191990

GLUCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5331913Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 14, 2017
Examiner
CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLUCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle P. Ciotola

Michelle P. Ciotola CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Smart watchesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
010medical instruments for recording physiological data, namely, glucose levels; medical implants consisting of artificial materialSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Design and development of software for importing and managing dataSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 16, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 15, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 31, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 31, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 14, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 20, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 23, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 23, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 14, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 29, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 29, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 24, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 24, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 1, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 31, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
May 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 31, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 22, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 21, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 20, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 20, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 27, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 27, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 22, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance