USPTO serial 79196638
BELLAMY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARESCA, MEREDITH Z
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BELLAMY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Baby food; organic baby food; infant formula; milk powder for babies; dried milk preparations being food for babies; babies' beverages; cereals for babies | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Preserved, dried or cooked fruit; preserved, dried or cooked vegetables; organic preserved, dried or cooked fruit; organic preserved, dried or cooked vegetables; tinned vegetables; tinned fruit; fruit puree; vegetable puree; prepared snacks made from cooked fruit; prepared snacks made from cooked vegetables; prepared snacks made from dried fruit; prepared snacks made from dried vegetables; milk; dairy products; yoghurt; yoghurt for drinking; organic milk products; cooked meals consisting principally of meat and vegetables; prepared meals, predominantly of meat or vegetables or poultry or fish; jellies; jams; organic jellies, jams or fruit compotes; fruit based snacks; organic fruit based snacks; fruit bars; snack foods included in this class; organic snack foods included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Pasta; organic pasta; rice cakes; organic rice cakes; rusks; organic rusks; biscuits; sauces for pasta and rice; porridge oats; custard; preparations made from organic cereals; rice based snack foods; snack foods consisting principally of grain; snack foods consisting principally of pasta; snack foods consisting principally of rice; snack foods made from cereals; snack foods made from corn; snack foods made of wheat; snack foods made of whole wheat; snack foods prepared from cereals; snack foods prepared from grains; oat-based food; breakfast cereals; ready-to-eat puddings; ready-to-eat meals included in this class; microwaveable meals included in this class; fruit sauces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |