USPTO serial 79198716
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
Munich, DE
Other trademarks owned by Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
80799 München, DE
Other trademarks owned by Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
80799 München, DE
Other trademarks owned by Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER A. VAN KIRK
Jennifer A. Van Kirk LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP201 East Washington StreetPhoenix, AZ 85004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic controllers for cameras and lenses; programmable digital displays specially adapted for use with cameras, for displaying camera, lens and other metadata from connected devices; remote controls for cameras and lenses; [ electronic controllers for surgical microscopes; ] accessories for the aforesaid goods, namely, power cables, data cables, control cables, and fitted transport cases | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |