USPTO serial 79199054
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyoko Imai
Kyoko Imai Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Air fragrancing preparations; detergents other than for use in manufacturing operations and medical purposes namely, detergents for household use, dish detergents; laundry detergent; detergents for laundry use; impregnated wipes in this class impregnated with skin cleanser for babies and infants; baby wipes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Disposable baby, infant and toddler diapers and diaper pants; vitamins; air deodorizers; deodorizing room sprays; air deodorizing preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Notebooks; books in the field of entrepreneurialism, overseas aid and development, charitable projects, social work and community issues; publications, namely, printed periodicals, newsletters, handouts, workbooks in the field of entrepreneurialism, overseas aid and development, charitable projects, social work and community issues | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online and retail store services featuring the sale of water, bottled water, non-alcoholic beverages, food products, body care products, nappies, baby wipes, and stationery products, in support of fundraising for charitable or humanitarian services, and other than in respect of caramel based spread for pastries and chocolates, chewing gum, chocolate being confectionery that is characterised by the presence of cocoa bean derivatives and is prepared from a minimum of 200 g/kg of cocoa bean derivatives and contains no more than 50 g/kg of edible oils, other than cocoa butter or dairy fats, chocolate bars, chocolate based spread for pastries and chocolates, chocolate candy, chocolate candy figures, chocolate pralines, coffee extracts, coffee mixes, coffee spread for pastries and chocolates, confectionery not being products that would be classified in Class 29, and not being goods that are fruit-based or nut-based, cookie mixes, ice cream, marzipan, mixes for making ice-cream, pastries, pastry cream, and pralines, and excluding the retail of gasoline supply services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 29, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |