Drawing for LIONIC

USPTO serial 79208569

LIONIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5455707Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2018
Examiner
SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIONIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Brucker

William J. Brucker Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker75 Enterprise, Suite 250Aliso Viejo, CA 92656UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, battery clusters, battery packs, battery based power sources, DC based power sources, electric accumulators, electric switches and electrical transformers; chargers for storage batteries and rechargeable batteries; electrical storage batteries, particularly for vehicle batteriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
037Maintenance and repair of rechargeable battery chargers and of security control equipment for power outagesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, namely, scientific research and development, engineering design services, research and development of batteries, battery based power sources, DC based power sources and power transmission methods; industrial analysis and research services in the field of batteries, battery based power sources, DC based power sources and power transmission; design and development of computers and softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2026Further Decision Processed by IB
Mar 17, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Mar 17, 2026INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Mar 17, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jul 15, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 15, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 1, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 12, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 4, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 2, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 9, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Aug 1, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 1, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 4, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 4, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 27, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 6, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 25, 2017SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance