USPTO serial 79211555
NEOVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEOVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Image recording apparatus; image transmission apparatus; image reproduction apparatus; digital recording media | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; information on telecommunications; communications by computer terminals; communications by fiber-optic networks; telephone communications; provision of access to databases; electronic bulletin board services (telecommunication services); connection by telecommunications to a global computer network; videoconferencing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical evaluations concerning design (engineers' services); scientific research; technical research; design of computers for others; development of computers; software design; software development; research and development of new products for others; conducting of technical project studies; architecture; design of interior decor; software development (design); software installation; software maintenance; updating of software; software rental; programming for computers; computer system analysis; computer system design; services provided by consultants relating to computer hardware design and development; digitization of documents; software as a service (SaaS); cloud computing; information technology (IT) consultancy; hosting of servers; vehicle roadworthiness testing; graphic arts design services; styling (industrial design); authentication of works of art; energy auditing; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |