USPTO serial 79214226
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ECZACIBASI HIJYEN URUNLERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ECZACIBASI HIJYEN URUNLERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ECZACIBASI TÜKETIM ÜRÜNLERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ECZACIBASI TÜKETIM ÜRÜNLERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
SANIPAK SAGLIKLI YASAM ÜRÜNLERI
TR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; perfumery; deodorants for personal use; dentifrices; abrasives, namely abrasive cloth, abrasive paper, pumice stone for personal use; polishing preparations, namely polishing creams, leather preservatives being polishes; waxes for leather; cosmetic cotton pads for removing make-up; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; shampoos | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |