Drawing for UNI CARE

USPTO serial 79214226

UNI CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNI CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; perfumery; deodorants for personal use; dentifrices; abrasives, namely abrasive cloth, abrasive paper, pumice stone for personal use; polishing preparations, namely polishing creams, leather preservatives being polishes; waxes for leather; cosmetic cotton pads for removing make-up; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; shampoosSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 13, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 5, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 27, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 15, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 7, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 26, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 9, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 9, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 16, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2017SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance