USPTO serial 79214699
AEROPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AEROPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lebow
Mark Lebow Ladas & Parry1700 Diagonal RoadSuite 505Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for user interface design for mobile phones; computer game software; computer graphics software; computer screen saver software; computer software development tools; computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; computer software for processing digital music files; computer software for controlling and managing access server applications; computer software for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs; computer software for use in digital animation and special effects of images; computer software that assists computers in deploying parallel applications and performing parallel computations; computer software to control and improve computer and equipment sound quality; computer software to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely, software for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images, and moving images in multimedia applications; computer software to transmit photographs to mobile telephones; data compression software; software for encoding information and data; software for decoding encoded information and data; downloadable software for use in computer application software for mobile phones, for computer games, for computer graphics, for computer screen savers, for computer software development tools, for communicating with users of hand-held computers, for processing digital music files, for controlling and managing access server applications, for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs, for digital animation and special effects of images, for assisting computers in deploying parallel applications and performing parallel computations, for controlling and improving computer and audio equipment sound quality, and to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely, software for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving images in multimedia applications, transmission of photographs to mobile telephones, and graphical user interface software; multimedia software recorded on recording medium in the field of computer games and entertainment; music-composition software; network access server operating software; software for processing images, graphics and text; software programmable microprocessors; video game software; virtual reality game software; computer software for educational purposes featuring instruction in computer development; software for use in optimizing computer hardware and software; computer software, namely, downloadable middleware for game development and operation that is provided through a network or recorded on computer media | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design; computer software programming; computer software maintenance; computer software consulting services; computer software consulting services for optimizing computer hardware and software; computer software development; development and design of computer software for providing digital sound and image; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; design of multimedia software applications; development of multimedia software applications; programming of multimedia applications; programming of multimedia equipment; rental of computer hardware; rental of computer software; rental of computer programs; providing electronic computer programs for user interface design; technical consultancy relating to design, programming or maintenance of computer software; integration of computer systems and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |