Drawing for SUPER-SIX

USPTO serial 79216558

SUPER-SIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5543005Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2018
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SUPER-SIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StreetKaysville, UT 84037United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Photographic lenses; optical lenses; microscope objectives; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, magnifying lenses; optical glasses; photographic filters; cases especially made for photographic apparatus and instrumentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 28, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 27, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 19, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 6, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 6, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 3, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 21, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 5, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
May 16, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 16, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 16, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 16, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 5, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 5, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 4, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 3, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 14, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance