USPTO serial 79218733
MAGICUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5969620Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2020
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MAGICUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr.
Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr. Whitmyer IP Group LLC600 Summer StreetStamford, CT 06901United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games, namely, board games, manipulative games, building games, card games, and toys, namely, toy building blocks, dolls, toy figures; decorations for Christmas trees; toy construction elements, namely, toy construction blocks; toy construction kits in the nature of toy construction sets and accessories therefor; playing cards; toy nesting building blocks; toy building blocks; educational toys for children for developing fine motor skills, cognitive skills and counting ability; nesting construction toys; construction toys integrating magnets; building games; three-dimensional toys which can be positioned for use in cube puzzle games, namely, cube-type puzzles; toy figurines; modular construction toys; toy construction vehicles; construction toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 18, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |