USPTO serial 79220057
PERFECTOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5847474Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 3, 2019
- Examiner
- BATT, JAIME L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PERFECTOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Perfectos Printing Inks Group Ltd
Bottesford Nottingham, GB
Perfectos Printing Inks Group Ltd
GB
Perfectos Printing Inks Group Ltd
GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
Richard M. LaBarge Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 S. Wacker DriveSuite 6300Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Solvents for inks and printing varnishes; release agents for printing inks; chemical retarding compositions for slowing the drying rate of printing inks; chemical preparations in the nature of accelerators for speeding the drying rate of printing inks; wetting agents for printing inks; anti-foaming agents; adhesives used in the printing industry for textiles, namely polyurethane (PU) screen printable adhesives, polyester (PE) screen printable adhesives, polyamide (PA) screen printable adhesives, acetone and ethyl acetate | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Specialty printing inks used in commercial or industrial printers; pigments used by commercial or industrial printers; fluorescent inks; metallic inks; metallic paste inks; lacquers; thermochromic printing inks; varnishes for commercial printing; colorants for use in the manufacture of printing ink; printing inks, namely inks for making multiple color dry transfer prints; printers' ink pastes, special effects pastes for printers; binding agents for printing inks; and thinners for printing inks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Perfectos Printing Inks Group Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Perfectos Printing Inks Group Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Perfectos Printing Inks Group Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named PERFECTOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |