USPTO serial 79223956
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather; animal skins; trunks and suitcases; umbrellas and parasols; walking sticks; whips; saddlery; wallets; purses (coin purses); credit card cases wallets; bags; vanity cases; collars for animals; garments for pets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing; footwear; headgear; shirts; clothing of leather; belts (clothing); furs (clothing); gloves (clothing); scarves; neckties; hosiery; socks; bedroom slippers; beach footwear; ski boots; footwear for sports; underwear | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |