USPTO serial 79225216
PXM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5881766Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2019
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PXM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE-211 40 Malmö, SE
SE-211 40 Malmö, SE
SE-211 40 Malmö, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Pickerill
John Pickerill Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.60 South 6th Street, Suite 1500Minneapolis, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management; business administration; clerical services; computerised business information services, namely, providing business information via computer networks; document reproduction; updating of advertising material; advertising; compilation of information into computer databases; compilation and systemization of information into computer databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Services in the field of science and technology, namely, online nondownloadable software used by enterprises for managing product information and related research and development services in the field of product information management, namely, software for tracking, organizing and displaying information about goods that an entity offers for sale; industrial research services, namely, research in the field of product information management; design and development of computer hardware and software; installation of computer software; design of computer hardware; information services relating to the application of computer systems, namely, providing information on product information management, specifically, information on tracking, organizing and displaying information about goods that an entity offers for sale | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |