Drawing for SEKISUI

USPTO serial 79228013

SEKISUI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5699824Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 19, 2019
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEKISUI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leigh Ann Lindquist

Leigh Ann Lindquist SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Effluent processing installations, namely, waste processing machines using heat and chemical breakdown processes; wastewater purification installations; filters for wastewater treatment apparatus; wastewater treatment apparatus, namely, recycled water installations featuring ultrafiltration membranes; wastewater treatment installations, namely, membrane separation treatment installationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 3, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 19, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 11, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 19, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 19, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 5, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 1, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 1, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 7, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 7, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 7, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 21, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 21, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 23, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 21, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 21, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 16, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 15, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 5, 2018LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 1, 2018SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance