USPTO serial 79230913
KOYO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOYO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John McGlynn
John McGlynn RatnerPrestia2200 Renaissance Blvd Suite 350King of Prussia, PA 19406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed pine nuts; prepared pine nuts; pine nut snack foods; pine nut flavoured snack foods; pine nut-based food bars; pine nut-based snack bars; butter, pastes and flakes made from processed pine nuts; nut oils for food, namely, pine nut oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cereal-based food bars also containing pine nuts; nuts flours, namely, pine nut flour | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 25, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 4, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |