USPTO serial 79233224
ASHANTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHLEGELMILCH, JONATHON A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASHANTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jenny Slocum
JENNY SLOCUM DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1825 EYE ST NWSUITE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Liqueurs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 2, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |