USPTO serial 79233731
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENNIS H. CAVANAUGH
DENNIS H. CAVANAUGH D H CAVANAUGH ASSOCIATES555 FIFTH AVENUE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fish jellies; processed algae for human consumption; alginates for culinary purposes; lecithin for culinary purposes; edible fats; edible oils; food products made from nuts, namely, meat substitutes, nut-based snack foods and prepared meals consisting primarily of nuts; formed vegetable protein for use as a meat substitute; processed nuts; nut-based snack food; potato-based snack foods; potato chips; nut-based spreads; meat substitutes; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes; tofu; vegetarian foods, namely, meat substitutes, and prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes; pollen prepared as foodstuff; processed edible seaweed; seaweed extracts for food; eggs; milk; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt, namely, milk, cheese, and butter; dairy product substitutes in the nature of artificial cream; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; hemp milk used as a milk substitute; rice milk for use as a milk substitute; nut milk; coconut milk; milk substitutes; cheese; butter; margarine; yogurt; yogurt drinks | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Rice; tapioca; sago; cracker meal; maize meal; oatmeal; bean meal; barley meal; maize gluten meal; dough; instant dough mix; bread; pastries; candy; grain-based food bars; grain-based food bars also containing protein; cereal-based snack foods; breakfast cereals; muesli; preparations made from cereal, namely, high protein cereal bars; wheat-based snack foods; grain-based snack foods; multigrain-based snack foods; corn-based snack foods; rice-based snack foods; pies; extruded corn snacks; extruded wheat snacks; wheat based foodstuffs, namely, snack foods in the nature of wheat based energy bars; oat based foodstuffs, namely, snack foods in the nature of oat based energy bars; grain based foodstuffs, namely, snack foods in the nature of grain based bars; cereal based foodstuffs, namely, snack foods in the nature of cereal based energy bars; maize based foodstuffs, namely, snack foods in the nature of maize flakes; pasta based foodstuffs, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; potato flour based foodstuffs namely, potato based energy bars; rice based foodstuffs, namely, snack foods in the nature of rice cakes and prepared meals consisting primarily of rice; soya flour based foodstuffs, namely, snack foods in the nature of soya based energy bars and prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta made from soya flour; pesto; pasta; dried pasta; pasta products, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta; noodles; vermicelli; packaged meals kits consisting primarily of pasta or rice; savory sauces used as condiments; mayonnaise; ice cream; frozen yogurt | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |