USPTO serial 79236949
TOTUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOTUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Key cases; vanity cases, not fitted; suitcases; travelling trunks; luggage and trunks; leather and imitation leather bags; bags for sports; chain mesh purses; purses; handbags; travelling handbags; hunter's game bags; briefcases; school bags; leatherboard; cases of leather or leatherboard; girths of leather; leather, unworked or semi-worked; synthetic leather; imitation leather; suitcase handles; animal skins; curried skins; chamois leather, other than for cleaning purposes; fur pelts; card wallets; pocket wallets; music cases; net bags for shopping; haversacks; beach bags; travelling bags; boxes of leather or leatherboard; boxes of vulcanised fibre; hat boxes of leather; valises; attaché cases; document cases; garment bags for travel; rucksacks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |